Date: 24th April 2012 at 2:35am
Written by:
Tevez is probably praying Rafael doesn't start

Tevez is probably praying Rafael doesn't start

Driving back home after the debacle that occurred on Sunday afternoon, despite not wishing to be reminded of what I’d just witnessed, nor wanting to listen to gleeful ABU presenters dancing on United’s title supposed title grave, I turned on Talksport

The first caller came up with an idea that at first seemed laughable. “We should play Antonio Valencia at right back when we go to Eastlands”

“No f*cking way! We can’t have our best winger, our most useful attacking force, pushed back into defence, that’s madness” I shouted at my radio as though someone was listening and could actually respond.

The caller began to list the problems he had with trusting Rafael Da Sliva for such a vital game, “he’s gifted but he’s a little bit too erratic, you never know whether he’ll make a mistake or a reckless challenge that could cost us dearly.”

“Mmm” I thought, not a bad point, granted but surely not enough to warrant moving a player who’s been beyond awesome for many months, into defence.

The more I thought about the caller’s suggestion, the more I warmed to the idea, not because I think Rafael isn’t a good player, he is, although I do have my concerns over his temperament and discipline, but also because there’s three wingers at United who all deserve a place in the starting line up.

With Valencia at right back it would allow Nani to play in his favoured position and give Ashley Young a chance to prove all the critics who’ve focused on his fondness for hitting the ground like a sniper victim every time he’s touched, rather than his excellent football skills. Then there’s also Valencia’s ability to get forward from deep and overlap Nani, much as Evra does on the left with Young or whoever. Just because the Ecuadorian would be playing at right back doesn’t mean he’s suddenly robbed of the ability to get forward- or the permission to either.

When it comes to Valencia, the last few games he hasn’t been quite the barnstorming winger he was the previous fifteen or so, as teams have seemed to cotton onto just how vital he is to United’s attacks and focused more effort and players on preventing him from making the amount of runs he usually does. I’m not for one minute saying Valencia’s been poor -he hasn’t- just that he seems to be putting in 6 or 7 out of 10 performances rather than 8 or 9 in the past few games.

Valencia has shown over the past two seasons that he’s more than adept at filling in at right back and there’s little doubt he can cope with anything City have to throw down their left hand side, be it David Silva, Nasri or whoever. With Rafael in the position, I can’t help but worry, that he may do a rash challenge early on and find himself in the referee’s book, whereby he’s suddenly got to watch every single challenge is perfect lest he get himself sent off. I’m not saying the Brazilians dirty, or that he’s always getting himself sent off, just that the way he plays, right on the edge and with such zeal, could leave him open to either being exposed by City’s wingers or punished by Andre Marriner- and not Howard Webb, despite all the rumours.

There are other options at right back of course, United could use Phil Jones there, although Ive yet to be convinced his best position isn’t in midfield and  throwing him in against Silva or whoever could be asking too much of a player that sometimes looks a little unsure in defence.

Chris Smalling is another choice but he’s hardly played at all lately and even if he was fit, would it be such a good idea putting him straight into a title decider? Probably not.

With Nani and Valencia down the right and Young and Evra down the left, United have two strong flanks that can handle both the attacking and defending aspects of the game, with the sort of pace and skill that could leave City dumbfounded.

Rafael was caught out a couple of times against Everton and while I think he’s got a great United future ahead of him, I can’t help but think for once a caller I heard on the radio, may just have hit the nail on the head.

Am I wrong? Is Rafael the obvious choice for Eastlands? Is it a waste of Valencia’s considerable talents putting him in defence?

Feel free to comment, suggest and abuse below:

For more Red nonsense follow Jay on twitter @RFFH

 

22 responses to “Antonio Valencia At Right Back For Eastlands?”

  1. giggs20 says:

    Actually, that’s a good idea. Rafael’s lack of awareness or his complacency allowed Everton to score 3 goals right in front his face. I love his ability to burst down the pitch but the high-energy runs always back fire in defense. He’s seems he’s more interested in attacking than defending most of the time. Shitty will make a meal out of Rafael.

  2. tony king says:

    Did he not have a few lapses playing in that position in some of our group games in the Champions League. If I was to replace Rafael with someone in at right back it would be Smalling

  3. Chris says:

    Let’s be cool here. That was Raf’s first bad game in a long time. He’s still our best right back and should start at Wastelands. What kind of message would SAF be sending if he dropped Raf?

  4. elvido says:

    The Vally/Nani and Evra/Young should cover us defensively and offensively. As long as we are not playing Giggsy and Carrick I think we should have a strong 11.

  5. ken abbot says:

    i aggree with the valencia theorey and here’s another weird one sacriligious, stupid, idiotic call it what you may. play rooney( who has virtually been playing in th midfield most of the season)along side either scholes or carrick with chicarito and wellbeck as the 2 strikers. and the crowd yell. ” no defenders”. i believe that wayne and danny have the ability to more than adequately perform any defensive duties that would be reqd. of but could also be 2/3 of a potentially potent strike force whose arund the ground movement with pace may prove more of a headache for city than what they might plan for .
    playing allout attacking football as we did with 10 men in the 6-1 belting was stupid and probably cost us 2 or 3 goals. iam still a great believer in the old adage. ATTACK(controlled)IS THE BEST FORM OF DEFENCE and if we end up getting nothing out of this game then it will not be because we approached it negatively. oh and by the way pts. would be level and city still have to go to GEORDIE LAND. and i don’t think they can pencil in 3pts. from that fixture?

  6. pj stretford end says:

    Great idea play nani in front of him .
    Smalling and jones are no good at right back rafael and evra are constantly out of position exposing our back four.
    This will sound a bit silly to some but richie de laet is the best right back at the club for me he is solid in the tackle very fast and not bad going forward either first and foremost he is a defender

  7. Ebiwonjumi ayodeji rapheal says:

    I think for me if ferguson want to win this manchester deby call league decider, he must play valencia at the right back, & play the squad as follow. 1 De gea 2valencia 6evans 5ferdinand 3evra 7nani 4carrick 8schouls 11young 9welbeck 10 rooney

  8. vm2620 says:

    i dont think thats necessary. Not this time of the season, lets leave it as is, and if rafael is exp problems den bring on y0ung throw nani on da rite n tonyv rb. Smalling and jones dare not be menti0nd at rb-tat can be a trick up our sleeve!

  9. Uni says:

    Spot on he was brilliant in that position last season as was giggs when reqd at left back

  10. Gatta says:

    I really admite with people who says rafeal do not have the stand to be at right back against Nasir/Silver if truly united want a win/draw. Putting Valencia @ back and Nani infront will be a very solid arrangement for SAF as to my side i have 100% sure on SAF that he know the kind of squad he needs against the city